Wonderful piece and remotely expressed Words flowing like water in oceans.
I d Miss someone with that book.
As the Young Lady entangled with teen.
Which flows the flawless love between them even when she got life imprisonment, She was turned to old And Teen was turned to Man.
Time had changed, but their love sustained as he gave her recordings of stories.
Also, Watch movie based on this novel, My one of favourite actress, the drama Queen Kate Winslet s performance was surreal.
I m not really sure why this book is considered one of the best books of all time and managed to make into the big 1001 list Most of the time, even if I don t like a book, I tend to understand why someone else picked it In this case, I m rather clueless Is it, perhaps, that people see in it some message about humanity when Hanna won t purchase her freedom with the secret she has kept hidden for years Is it the vivid sexual tale of a teenage boy with an older woman Are we supposed to be shocked by it The novel starts with a romance when fifteen year old Michael finds himself ill on the way home from school and is taken in by a woman twice his age They begin an affair which is described by numerous critics as erotic This was the first hurdle my enjoyment came up against When I was fifteen with raging hormones and an extremely good looking history teacher, I would probably have been able to appreciate the eroticism of such an opportunity to have an illicit affair with someone much older and experienced But that s just a bunch of teenage fantasies that would never have become realities Now, it creeps me out I couldn t see it as a love story, I saw it as being about an adult who takes advantage of a child all very ironic when I think about my first interpretation of Lolita, but I guess I grew up somewhat.
It has been suggested that we are expected to draw parallels between Hanna s secret and the behaviour of most German people during the second world war, that is why Schlink deliberately set the novel in this fragile post war period But I m really not a fan of stories that are one big metaphor for something else or no, maybe it isn t so much that I don t like that, but that it has to be done in a manner which I find appealing and it has to be obvious I refuse to believe in metaphors that have been proposed by some random critic and then jumped on by everyone else I m trying not to give away Hanna s secret in case there are people who haven t worked it out straight away, but I wasn t buying into this metaphor.
This combined with the author s sparse tone quickly distanced me from the novel I just prefer interesting and complex characters, an engaging plot, relationships I care about I prefer all this over metaphor In the end, metaphor is subjective and if I can t see it myself without someone else suggesting it to me then I believe either the author failed to make their metaphorical point clearly enough or the metaphor itself doesn t exist.
There are some books you know will stay with you forever, and Bernhard Schlink s The Reader is definitely one of them It has been highly critically acclaimed, winning the Boston Book Review s Fisk Fiction Prize, and it deserves all the praise it has received The Holocaust is a difficult, though much covered, subject matter, and this novel has a sure touch and an appealing lack of judgment with it The story begins in the world of almost childhood of fifteen year old Michael Berg, recovering from a summer of hepatitis, begins a relationship with Hanna, a much older woman he meets by chance The first part of the novel, untouched by the shadow of the recent war or Germany s disturbed and dangerous past, deals with Michael and Hanna s burgeoning relationship, and the little fears and worries that can make up one big problem Eventually, as we know it must, their relationship ends and Hanna moves away.
When the book moves on to the second part, the tone has changed considerably Michael, now a law student, attends the trial of female Nazi war criminals To his shock, one of them is Hanna, who had been a camp guard at Auschwitz I won t say for fear of spoiling it for you, but the Holocaust is seriously considered in the light of philosophy and moral responsibility There is an attitude that one becomes numb to the horror of it all if too exposed to it, and this book does not go into ghastly detail, but rather examines even painful details who was to blame, how do we live with the suffering, how can one atone, and most of all, what is the next generation to do It also looks at what it means to love someone, how much we can accept of them and how blind we can be to those we love Love, guilt and betrayal feature prominently in this novel.
In many ways Hanna was innocent, and yet it becomes apparent that she lived every day with terrible guilt Michael was a victim of her actions, and yet he too is guilty by association The reader of the title is Michael, who read to Hanna during the early part of the relationship the reader is Hanna, alone in prison occupying herself by learning about the experiences of camp inmates The reader is selected individuals in the camps who read aloud to Hanna, and may have died because of it But most of all, the reader is ourselves the title points the finger at us, because now we have the knowledge, what should we do with it If all it takes for evil to prevail is for the good to remain silent, then how innocent are any of us And how can we deal with the subsequent guilt There are so many layers to this subtly complex novel that having just finished it, I have to start it again The transforming power of words is negated by their ultimate futility, and actions in this novel speak deafeningly loud.
If we have a responsibility towards the past, to learn from it, and I believe we do, then this book will help us to go some way towards fulfilling it.
booring is that a review this was just very flat to me i wasn t offended by the subject matter i could care less about the scandalous elements but the writing was so clinical and thin at one point, i blamed the translation, but c mon its not that hard to translate german to english i can t do it, of course, but it s supposed to be one of the easiest translations i have nothing helpful to say about this except i was bored bored bored the characters were unappealing, the twists were ho hum, and i thought it very dry.
i don t know what oprah was thinkingcome to my blog The biggest problem I had with this book was the fact that it made me feelnothing I didn t feel connected to the characters or to any part of the plot This is quite a bummer, as it deals with a pretty heavy topic I feel like the author intended to write the story this way though, because the writing style in general has a certain type of coldness to it, and the true feelings of a character are never really explored Some people might not be bothered by this, but I personally simply prefer feeling close and connected to the characters of a story This doesn t make the entire book bad though It certainly was interesting, and Bernhard Schlink is skillful with how he uses words He describes mundane activities in a wonderful and fascinating way, and this makes me understand 100% why so many schools choose this novel as part of their required reading material.
I also appreciated how he always got straight to the point, instead of writing unnecessary details to prolong the plot points we all already know are coming I also couldn t help but feel disgusted at the things taking place in the first part of the book, and I wish the problematic aspects were explored further, instead of just brushing upon the issue later on.
Overall, this was a good book to read inbetween, but nothing life changing or special.